Friday Gospel Recharge Series
Friday Gospel Recharge
A Reflection on John 6: 52 - 59
(3rd Friday of Eastertide, Year B of the Liturgical Calander, 2024)
Navigating doubt: Exploring the real presence of the Eucharist
The dynamics of doubt in human experience are
multifaceted and can be influenced by various factors. Doubts may arise due to
the uncertainty of an idea or situation, such as the idea found in the
discourse in today’s Gospel: “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” We
can also doubt due to fear of the future: “If I take this job opportunity,
would it really establish a new base salary for a promising and better future?
If it doesn’t, what a waste of time and effort.” Cultural influence, another
important factor, shapes one’s belief and attitudes in a particular way, making
us sceptical and critical of other ideas, leading to moments of doubt too.
In today’s Gospel, Jesus sparks doubt with his
doctrine on the Eucharist, which we profess to be Jesus’s true body and blood.
The Jews, with the customs and rituals, are troubled by this saying, since
Jesus presents them a new commandment which looks akin to cannibalism, a
practice forbidden by the law of Moses. Like our Catholic tradition, the Jews
believed in the sanctity of human life due to our created image and likeness to
God, and so eating a human person is forbidden. However, the Jews, while
zealous for Godly things, were preoccupied with purity. They were forbidden to
touch a diseased person, eat an animal found dead, nor drink the blood of
animals, for all these things made them impure. Purity was important as it made
a person more like God; purer your actions closer you related to God. Eating
Jesus flesh and blood therefore would make them not only cannibals but impure.
Cannibalism, however, is not what is practiced
in the Church. The Eucharist, while it is Christ’s body and blood, is not a
physical and literal presence of Christ. Although it is the actual deified body
of the Lord presented under the accidents of bread and wine, at the same time
not a symbolic representation, even though the external appearance remains. To
believe the miracle of the Eucharist is Christ requires, therefore, the eyes of
faith to see.
In our modern world, doubters of the Eucharist
exist, many being baptised and confirmed Catholics. This is unfortunate news
because Catholics are required to believe in the real presence; there are no
two ways about it. Before receiving the Sacrament of Confirmation, we prepare
for our first reception of the Sacrament of the Eucharist, and in the
preparatory stages, candidates are informed in what we believe as Catholics in
the Eucharist and that they are required to believe it in order to receive this
gift given to us from heaven.
Pope Benedict XVI, and like many before him,
have emphasised the doctrine of the transubstantiation of the Eucharist is
confirmed in the scriptures. For example, in today’s Gospel, Jesus tells us
that his body is “real” food, and his blood is “real” drink. This is the first
of the two references of the Eucharist. What Jesus means to say is that the
Eucharist is indeed not a symbol but truly his body. If he meant anything
else, he would have said this is “like” my body, or a “metaphor” for my body.
For this reason, the Church has always believed that the Eucharist is truly
Jesus Christ. Since many Catholics today lack grounding in scripture and
tradition, this doctrine has become difficult to accept and misunderstood.
Doubt surrounding the real presence of the
Eucharist can be overcome by turning to what the church has taught and defended
over the centuries. Controversy over the real presence is not recent; it’s been
defended since the 1st century. The Didache, a 1st-century document, offers
glimpses of what the early Church taught. Many people have died for this
teaching. St Justin Martyr, an apologist and philosopher in the early to
mid-2nd century, died, among many other Christians, for believing and defending
in the real presence. His defense can be found in the 1st Apology, chapter 66.
Today, people mock and threaten us for our belief. In more recent times,
Richard Dawkins, a world-renowned English biologist, said once in an interview
and also to a public crowd that atheists should mock and ridicule Catholics for
professing in the real presence.
If Jesus did not mean what he meant about our
participating in his body and blood in the Eucharist, he would have said so.
God is neither a liar nor a deceiver, and so he has been very clear with his
words, referring to the Eucharist as his own body and blood. He wants what is
best for us, and that is our reunification with him in heaven. When we consume
Jesus in the Eucharist, it signifies that reality of what is to come: life with
God or communion with him.
We cannot return to God using our own strength;
we need God’s strength to help us along the way. God, in a sacramental way,
paves that way by giving us himself as Eucharistic food for the journey. What
better nourishment is there to have then God himself in the Eucharist?
There is this saying: You are what you eat.
Since we are made in the image and likeness of God we become exactly that
through partaking in the Eucharist. God wants us, therefore, to be like him.
Let us ponder then where we are at in our spiritual
journey in relation to Eucharist. What is my current belief and what do I
need to do to increase my faith in Jesus in the Eucharist?